This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

Edward Snowden has long expressed frustration with the pace, and to a certain extent the depth, of the journalism springing from the classified NSA documents he brought to lite only over a yr agone. In his estimation, the abuses of power on display in those leaked documents should exist splayed out before the public — and perhaps that'south why, after all this time, he's decided to outset dropping bits of data all on his own. Splitting from his original, principled stand that only experienced journalistic organizations would make up one's mind what to release and when, Snowden has told Wired about the NSA project that finally pushed him to plow on the agency: MonsterMind.

MonsterMind, co-ordinate to Snowden, is an democratic cyberwarfare software platform that can lookout man international connections to place and "kill" malicious cyber attacks before they hit American infrastructure — essentially a "cyber missile defense" arrangement tailored to provide protection against the global tempest of cyber-attacks. Unlike missile defense, even so, MonsterMind has the ability to "fire back" at the aggressor, launching a cyber counter-attack of its own. This would presumably be washed to disincentivize attacking the US — but as Snowden himself points out in the interview, these attacks can exist routed through innocent tertiary parties in totally carve up parts of the earth. Could Chinese hackers trick MonsterMind into "firing back" at an Iranian military machine installation? No matter what you think of the NSA, believe that it is competent enough to avoid a pitfall as obvious as that.

This could be the inspiration, but I doubt it.

This could be the inspiration, but I doubt it.

Of all the major NSA revelations, this has to exist one of the most frivolous. Certainly, Snowden has a point that international aggression should not be automated, whether concrete or cyber in nature. Still, at that place is a discreet modify in office between revealing an illegal spying programs similar Optic Nerve and something similar this which is, in reality, exactly what the NSA is supposed to be doing. As scary as the name "MonsterMind" sounds, cyber missile defense is specifically what nosotros should besupporting, and then as to avert giving the NSA the impression that it literally can't practise annihilation without being called tyrannical.

Snowden argues that the metadata analysis necessary to brand MonsterMind work, even defensively, is besides invasive — merely sniffing for malicious transmission types is precisely what the NSA is supposed to be doing with metadata. Additionally, Snowden'due south start worry is based by and large on the idea that the NSA wouldn't know much about the sender or receiver of the transmission, and would thus be acting blindly. This seems similar a trumped up upshot.

Let'south proceed the scale of these retaliatory cyber attacks in mind; Snowden uses the example of a Russian hospital as a possible mistaken target, but if this did happen the result would be minimal. Even if the NSA was incapable of noticing such an obvious ploy, most of these attacks are investigative or malware-installing — they're not causing explosions or anything. While I respect the rights of earth citizens to be secure from spying, the NSA is merely keeping step with global trends here; they're unlikely to get the U.s. in too much hot h2o with other countries since by doing so those other countries would open themselves to the very same international criticisms in the future. This is a much more questionable apply of the whistleblower label than Snowden has embodied until now.

Mayhap Glenn Greenwald and others held dorsum on a MonsterMind revelation because they decided at that place wasn't a great enough public involvement to warrant the possible dangers — though perhaps not, given that the Intercept retweeted a link to the MonsterMind article. This ambivalence is exactly why Snowden left releases up to The Guardian and others in the first place: they have large teams of lawyers and experts (non to mention representatives from the government) to provide perspective and make these decisions in a responsible way.

monstermind head 2Again, to criticize the NSA for this program, in the context of its prior transgressions, is to say that all intelligence work is equally illegitimate. This isn't just basically unfair, information technology too makes abuses far more probable — if you lot're accused of criminal activity no matter what yous do, it's very easy to create a culture in which almost anything is permitted. In that location are definitely problematic aspects to the MonsterMind program, but this is ultimately a well-intentioned initiative with some weaknesses, not a fundamentally invalid one designed from the ground upwardly to subvert domestic and international justice. Let's keep that distinction in mind.

I have been never-endingly impressed by Snowden'due south ability to stick to his convictions and maintain the moral loftier ground over the past year or and so. A big part of that has been his determination to stick with (or, depending on your point of view, hide behind) the journalistic organizations he entrusted with state secrets. Nosotros don't know the specifics that led to this Wired interview, nor what Snowden's personal or financial state of affairs is today. At that place could be any number of factors leading to this shift in behavior — but he needs to be careful. His integrity is all that's kept him in the running for credence by the American public; if he loses that, he'due south lost everything.